From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Comm'r Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

518806

11-26-2014

In the Matter of the Claim of Naomi FOSTER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Cindy R. Katz, Queens Legal Services, Jamaica, for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.


Cindy R. Katz, Queens Legal Services, Jamaica, for appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., STEIN, GARRY, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 2013, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment.

Claimant, a registered nurse, applied for unemployment insurance benefits following the loss of her job. Thereafter, claimant received a letter from a former employer, a staffing agency, notifying her that her previous position as a registered nurse was available at one of its facilities. According to testimony from the employer's representatives, claimant never contacted the staffing agency about the position until months after the letter was sent and presented numerous excuses for her failure to respond. Although claimant testified that she had called within a week of receiving the letter but was told no job was available, the conflict in the testimony presented a credibility issue for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (see Matter of Newman [Commissioner of Labor], 43 A.D.3d 592, 593, 840 N.Y.S.2d 497 [2007] ; Matter of Turner [Commissioner of Labor], 6 A.D.3d 915, 916, 774 N.Y.S.2d 454 [2004] ). In light of the Board's credibility determinations, we find that its decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits and charging her with a recoverable overpayment is supported by substantial evidence and will therefore not be disturbed (see Matter of Guido [Commissioner of Labor], 108 A.D.3d 919, 920, 968 N.Y.S.2d 742 [2013] ; Matter of Scuderi [Commissioner of Labor], 40 A.D.3d 1234, 1235, 836 N.Y.S.2d 313 [2007] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Foster v. Comm'r Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Foster v. Comm'r Labor

Case Details

Full title:NAOMI FOSTER, Appellant. v. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
122 A.D.3d 1224
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8294