From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 15, 2023
1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC)

05-15-2023

MICHAEL FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO ANSWER (ECF NO. 37)

Plaintiff Michael Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On May 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant's answer. (ECF No. 37.)

Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provide for the right to file a reply to an answer, and the Court did not order that a reply be filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a)(7). Therefore, the reply to the answer filed by Plaintiff on May 12, 2023, is stricken from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Foster v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 15, 2023
1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Foster v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 15, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)