From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Berkeley Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. C10-03703 SI (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. C10-03703 SI (ADR)

10-24-2011

NADRA FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants.

ZACH COWAN, City Attorney MATTHEW J. OREBIC, Deputy City Attorney LYNNE S. BOURGAULT, Deputy City Attorney MATTHEW J. OREBIC Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BERKELEY, , DOUGLAS HAMBLETON, ALEXANDER McDOUGALL and ERIK KEENE ARCOLINA PANTO Attorney for Plaintiff NADRA FOSTER NGO LEGAL GROUP, A Professional Corp. STEVE NGO Attorney for Defendants LOIS WITHERS, KPFA, and PACIFICA FOUNDATION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Zach Cowan, City Attorney, SBN 96372

Matthew J. Orebic, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 124491

Lynne S. Bourgault, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 180416

BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF BERKELEY, DOUGLAS HAMBLETON,

ALEXANDER McDOUGALL and ERIK KEENE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE DEPOSITION

OF DR. LISA LATTANZA BEYOND THE

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

The parties through their counsel herein stipulate that the deposition of Dr. Lisa Lattanza, a treating doctor for plaintiff, currently set for October 25, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. at UCSF Medical Center, 1500 Owens Street, First Floor, San Francisco, CA can be continued to November 22, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. at the same location. The non-expert discovery cutoff is October 28, 2011. Defense counsel for City of Berkeley, Matthew Orebic, requests this continuance of the deposition to a date beyond the percipient witness discovery cutoff because (1) Mr. Orebic is needed at a medical procedure for his 88-year old mother that was recently scheduled on an expedited basis, (2) there is no other person or family member as appropriate as Mr. Orebic to transport and care for his mother on October 25, and (3) the next available date for Dr. Lattanza to give a deposition is November 22. Plaintiff's counsel is concerned that parties do not have the authority to make such a stipulation, but is amenable due to human concerns.

Respectfully submitted:

ZACH COWAN, City Attorney

MATTHEW J. OREBIC, Deputy City Attorney

LYNNE S. BOURGAULT, Deputy City Attorney

MATTHEW J. OREBIC

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF BERKELEY, , DOUGLAS

HAMBLETON, ALEXANDER McDOUGALL

and ERIK KEENE

Respectfully submitted:

ARCOLINA PANTO

Attorney for Plaintiff

NADRA FOSTER

Respectfully submitted:

NGO LEGAL GROUP, A Professional Corp.

STEVE NGO

Attorney for Defendants

LOIS WITHERS, KPFA, and PACIFICA

FOUNDATION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

Judge of the U.S. District Court


Summaries of

Foster v. Berkeley Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. C10-03703 SI (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Foster v. Berkeley Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:NADRA FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

No. C10-03703 SI (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)