Opinion
2:22-cv-01728-JHC
10-25-2023
MAGDALENA K. FOSS, Plaintiff, v. LAURA M. ALSPACH, PAUL HENDERSON, JEREMY MUIR, MARK KONOSKE, SHAWN LEDFORD and KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JEREMY MUIR'S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(C)
John H. Chun, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Jeremy Muir's motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(c). Dkt. # 50. The Court has considered: all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the motion; pertinent portions of the record; and the applicable law. The motion is noted for October 27, 2023, but it is fully briefed and the Court sees no reason to delay ruling. Being fully advised, for the reasons argued by Defendant Muir, Dkt. ## 50 & 56, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff presents no argument or authority to persuade the Court that, with respect to Defendant Muir, (1) she either met the limitations deadline; or (2) her motion for leave to amend her complaint to add Defendant Muir somehow relates back to the filing of the original complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(1)(C). The Court thus DISMISSES the claims against Defendant Muir with prejudice. And accordingly, the Court STRIKES as moot “Defendant Jeremy Muir's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Federal Claims Against Him.” See Dkt. # 54.