From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dan v. Dan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 23, 2012
55 A.3d 565 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-23

Mary Lou DAN v. Michael T. DAN.

Charles D. Ray and Lee Friend Lizotte, Hartford, in support of the petition. George J. Markley, Fairfield, in opposition.


Charles D. Ray and Lee Friend Lizotte, Hartford, in support of the petition. George J. Markley, Fairfield, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 137 Conn.App. 728, 49 A.3d 298, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's granting of the plaintiff's motion for modification based upon a change in circumstances?

“2. If so, did the Appellate Court properly reject the defendant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion by considering anew all the statutory criteria set forth in General Statutes § 46b–82, rather than limiting its decision to those factors that had changed since the date of dissolution?”

*566EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Dan v. Dan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 23, 2012
55 A.3d 565 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Dan v. Dan

Case Details

Full title:Mary Lou DAN v. Michael T. DAN.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

55 A.3d 565 (Conn. 2012)
307 Conn. 924

Citing Cases

Dan v. Dan

a) Unless and to the extent that the decree precludes modification, any final order for the periodic payment…