From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortune v. Hamber

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 04 - 377, Doc. No. 89 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04 — 377, Doc. No. 89.

July 22, 2008


ORDER


On February 14, 2008 Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the above action. According to the federal rules of civil procedure, Plaintiff's response was due within 30 days. Nothing was filed by Plaintiff until July 14, 2008 at which time he filed a motion for extension of time to file a response, alleging that he has been unable to use the prison law library.

In support of this claim Plaintiff attaches his requests to use the library, the denials and his grievances regarding same. According to this documentation, Plaintiff's requests were made on March 28, 16 days after his response was due. In addition, the grievance denial states that he would be allowed to use the law library on afternoons and weekends as he had requested by providing evidence of a court deadline. Plaintiff had a deadline that was already passed but there is no indication that he notified the administration of same. The documentation further indicates that he did not try to access the law library again until June 2, although he did find time to appeal the denial of the grievance. I suggest that Plaintiff's time would have been better spent trying to use the library at the times available or notifying the administration that he had a court deadline. In any event, he now has a deadline of August 18, 2008 pursuant to this order, to respond to the motion for summary judgment. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2008, that Plaintiff's Motion for extension is GRANTED and he is given until August 25, 2008 to respond to the motion for summary judgment filed on February 14, 2008. No further extensions will be granted and the motion will be decided without the benefit of a response if none is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), and Local Rule 72.1.3, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file an appeal from this order to the District Court. Any opposing party shall have ten (10) days from the date of service of the appeal to respond thereto. Failure to timely file an appeal may constitute a waiver of any appellate rights.


Summaries of

Fortune v. Hamber

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 04 - 377, Doc. No. 89 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Fortune v. Hamber

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH FORTUNE, Plaintiff, v. CARL HAMBER, Unit Manager; MARTIN L…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 22, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 04 - 377, Doc. No. 89 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 22, 2008)