Opinion
2:11-cv-01231-PMP -VCF
10-21-2011
RANDY FORTUNATO, Plaintiff, v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, et at., Defendants.
ORDER
Before the court is pro se plaintiff Randy Fortunato's Motion For Scheduling Conference (#7). No opposition or reply has been filed.
On July 29, 2011, plaintiff filed his complaint against Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Robertino Gooding. (#1). Subsequently, on August 30, 2011, defendants filed their answer (#5). Thereafter, plaintiff filed the present motion seeking a scheduling conference. (#7). Following the filing of this motion, on October 14, 2011, the court received a Notice of Settlement of Entire Action signed by plaintiff and defense counsel. (#10). In the notice, the parties asserted that they would complete the settlement and file a stipulation of dismissal within 30 days from the date of the notice. Id. Therefore, the present motion (#7) is moot.
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that pro se plaintiff Randy Fortunato's Motion For Scheduling Conference (#7) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation memorializing their settlement and dismissing the case on or before November 14, 2011.
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE