From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortunato v. Cavalry Portfolio Services

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 25, 2011
2:11-cv-01231-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-cv-01231-PMP-VCF.

October 25, 2011


ORDER


Before the court is pro se plaintiff Randy Fortunato's Motion For Scheduling Conference (#7). No opposition or reply has been filed.

On July 29, 2011, plaintiff filed his complaint against Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Robertino Gooding. (#1). Subsequently, on August 30, 2011, defendants filed their answer (#5). Thereafter, plaintiff filed the present motion seeking a scheduling conference. (#7). Following the filing of this motion, on October 14, 2011, the court received a Notice of Settlement of Entire Action signed by plaintiff and defense counsel. (#10). In the notice, the parties asserted that they would complete the settlement and file a stipulation of dismissal within 30 days from the date of the notice. Id. Therefore, the present motion (#7) is moot.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that pro se plaintiff Randy Fortunato's Motion For Scheduling Conference (#7) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation memorializing their settlement and dismissing the case on or before November 14, 2011.

DATED this 21st day of October, 2011.


Summaries of

Fortunato v. Cavalry Portfolio Services

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 25, 2011
2:11-cv-01231-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Fortunato v. Cavalry Portfolio Services

Case Details

Full title:RANDY FORTUNATO, Plaintiff, v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

2:11-cv-01231-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2011)