From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortuna Broom Company v. Wirtz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 19, 1967
379 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 24141.

June 19, 1967.

Virgil Howard, and Wade Howard, Corpus Christi, Tex., for appellants.

Bessie Margolin, Associate Sol., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Charles Donahue, Sol. of Labor, Robert E. Magle, William Fauver, Attorneys, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., Major J. Parmenter, Regional Attorney, for appellee.

Before BROWN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and SUTTLE, District Judge.


The Employer appeals from the judgment of the District Court after an adequate evidentiary hearing holding that the employees in question did not come within any exemption of the FLSA, ordering restitution of minimum and overtime wages due such employees, and enjoining future violations of the Act by the Employer.

Fortuna Broom Company and South Texas Broom Corn Company, both incorporated in Texas and substantially owned, controlled and managed by J.L. Beck.

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 213(a)(6), 213(a) (10). Nor does the Employer qualify for belatedly asserted "seasonal industry" exemption. 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(b)(3).

The Employer had been investigated and convicted of violating the Act in 1957. He does not here contest this portion of the order.

We find the appeal and record wholly without any redeeming merit, but since we have expended the travail for submission, we dispose of it on its merits, or, more accurately, the lack of them, rather than dismiss as frivolous. United States v. Safety Engineering Supply Co., 5 Cir., 374 F.2d 885 [March 23, 1967]; see also NLRB v. Riley Aeronautics Corp., 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 557 [June 6, 1967].

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fortuna Broom Company v. Wirtz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 19, 1967
379 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Fortuna Broom Company v. Wirtz

Case Details

Full title:FORTUNA BROOM COMPANY, South Texas Broom Corn Company and J.L. Beck…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 19, 1967

Citations

379 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.

Likewise, the small size of appellees' business and the possible hardship caused them by having to pay the…

Trustees of Amalgamated Ins. Fund v. Danin

In addition, lower courts had consistently found that the FLSA definition of "employer" enlarged the common…