From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortun v. Fortun

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1992
596 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2977.

April 29, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Paul B. Kanarek, Judge.

Judith C. Maynard, pro se.

John E. Marke, Lake Worth, for appellee.


We summarily affirm under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur.

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.


There are several points raised in appellant's brief, including visitation restrictions, failure to award alimony, and failure to make any equitable distribution of assets which raise meritorious points. Of course, an answer brief may convince us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in these matters, but I cannot conclude that the brief itself is so non-meritorious as to justify the application of Rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Fortun v. Fortun

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1992
596 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Fortun v. Fortun

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF JUDITH MAYNARD FORTUN, APPELLANT, v. BRYON P…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 29, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)