From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortner v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB.

October 1, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before me on the plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause, and Preliminary Injuction [sic] and Permanent Injunction [Doc. #9, filed 12/27/06] (the "Motion").

The Motion is directed at the allegations of the plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Motion, ¶ 2. On April 26, 2007, the plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Verified Complaint [Doc. #52] as a matter of course. As a result, the Motion is no longer directed at the operative complaint. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Fortner v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Fortner v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL FORTNER, and JENNIFER FORTNER, d/b/a Diamond/Dundee Tree Service…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 1, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)