Opinion
Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB.
August 6, 2008
ORDER
On June 27, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued and served his Recommendation (Doc 202) that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Verified Complaint (Doc 163) be denied. I granted Plaintiffs' motion for extension of time to file objections to the Recommendation to and including August 4, 2008. Believing that Plaintiffs failed to timely file objections to the Recommendation, on August 5, 2008 I entered an order accepting the Recommendation without de novo review and denied the motion. It now appears that the Plaintiffs did timely file their specific written objections to the Recommendation on August 4, 2008. Accordingly, this date I vacated the August 5, 2008 order.
I have now reviewed the Recommendation de novo in light of the Plaintiffs' objections to it and the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the Recommendation is correct. Accordingly
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Verified Complaint (Doc 163) is DENIED.