From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortner v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 15, 2008
Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB.

October 15, 2008


ORDER


This case is before me on the "Plaintiffs' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to Deny Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File the Fifth Amended Complaint (Doc 250)." The County Defendants and City Defendants have filed their responses to the Plaintiffs' objections (Docs 252, 253). I have reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc 248) that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Fifth Amended Verified Complaint be denied de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review I conclude that the recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Fifth Amended Verified Complaint is DENIED.


Summaries of

Fortner v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 15, 2008
Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Fortner v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL FORTNER and JENNIFER FORTNER, d/b/a Diamond/Dundee Tree Service…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2008)