Opinion
Civil Case No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB.
April 8, 2010
ORDER
The following appears from the record in this case. As to the County Defendants, on January 25, 2010, I reversed the Magistrate Judge's denial of the County Defendants' request to file a supplemental summary judgment motion (Doc 352) and ordered the Magistrate Judge to consider and issue recommendations upon the County Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 322). The City Defendants filed a Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 324). The Magistrate Judge denied the City Defendants' request to file supplemental summary judgment motions (Doc 338). While I reversed the Magistrate Judge's denial of the request of the County Defendants to file supplemental summary judgment motions, that Order did not address the City Defendants' motion to file supplemental summary judgment motions. The Magistrate Judge denied the City Defendants' Motion to File Supplemental Summary Judgment Motions (Doc 338) and that order was not appealed by the City Defendants to me pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). The City Defendants are therefore barred from review of the Magistrate Judge's order of denial. Then on April 5, 2010, I improvidently referred the City Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment to the Magistrate Judge (Doc 377). Because the City Defendants are barred from review of the Magistrate Judge's now final order denying their request to file supplemental summary judgment motions
IT IS ORDERED that the City Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 324) is STRICKEN.