Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated

Full title: FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. TREND MICRO…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Apr 27, 2010

CASE NO.: CV 10-0048 MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV 10-0048 MMC.

April 27, 2010

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64307, STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717, ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH ROSATI, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, FORTINET, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF FORTINET, INC.'S CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

MAXINE CHESNEY, District JudgePage 1

Having considered Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.'s Administrative Motion Requesting Leave to File Under Seal Portions of Fortinet, Inc.'s Corrected Complaint for Declaratory Judgment ("Corrected Complaint") pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet's Corrected Complaint are filed under seal:

a) 4:21-5:1 (following "Trend Micro Japan . . ." through ". . . by this Agreement'");

b) 5:24 (the last word of the sentence).

The Clerk is directed to file under seal the unredacted version of the Corrected Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.