Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated

Full title: FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. TREND MICRO…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Apr 9, 2010

CASE NO.: CV 10-0048 MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV 10-0048 MMC.

April 9, 2010

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64307, STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717, ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH ROSATI, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, FORTINET, INC.

[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE CORRECTED COMPLAINT AND DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

MAXINE CHESNEY, District JudgePage 2

Having considered Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.'s Administrative Motion Requesting Leave to File Under Seal Portions of Exhibit A to Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File Corrected Complaint ("Exhibit A") pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the following portions of Exhibit A are filed under seal:

a) 4:21-5:1 (following "Trend Micro Japan . . ." through ". . . by this Agreement'");

b) 5:24 (the last word of the sentence).

Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, no later than April 14, 2010, a redacted version of Exhibit A.

IT IS SO ORDERED.