From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortenberry v. Kelley

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2023
No. 22-12367 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2023)

Opinion

22-12367

09-08-2023

RICHARD FORTENBERRY, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA KELLEY, et al., Defendants.


Kimberly G. Altman, United States Magistrate Judge

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JULY 20, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22)

F. Kay Behm, United States District Judge

Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman's July 20, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 22). Magistrate Judge Altman recommends the dismissal of defendants Lamb, Miller, Anderson, Fritz, Jones, Webb, Baldwin, and Leslie, after screening of the amended complaint, for failure to state a claim. Id. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition.

Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) and DISMISSES defendants Lamb, Miller, Anderson, Fritz, Jones, Webb, Baldwin, and Leslie as defendants from this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fortenberry v. Kelley

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2023
No. 22-12367 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Fortenberry v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD FORTENBERRY, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA KELLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2023

Citations

No. 22-12367 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2023)