Opinion
May 16, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).
Defendants' motion for renewal was properly denied because the new material they submit was available to them at the time of the original motion ( 213 A.D.2d 257, adhering to 196 A.D.2d 440, upon renewal), and they fail to offer a valid excuse for not having submitted this material at that time.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.