From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forte v. Velez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 783 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

October 2, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, OLIVER D. WILLIAMS, J.

Delukey Shapiro ( Stanley Shapiro of counsel), for appellants.

Henry Cron and Irving Wallenstein for respondent.


Landlord waived the breach of covenant by accepting rent with knowledge of such breach. Landlord also failed to establish by competent proof that the occupancy here involved was illegal because of the requirements of law and subjected her to civil or criminal penalties. This disposition is without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding, if the landlord be so advised, in the event that a violation is placed against the property by competent authority.

The final order should be unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to tenants and petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Forte v. Velez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 783 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Forte v. Velez

Case Details

Full title:MARY FORTE, Respondent, v. NORBERTO VELEZ et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1959

Citations

19 Misc. 2d 783 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
195 N.Y.S.2d 874