From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forsythe v. Nevin

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 14, 2011
Case No.: 2:10-cv-01316-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10-cv-01316-GMN-PAL.

March 14, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is petitioner's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 43), filed by Larry James Forsythe (aka Scott Alan Bluethman), arguing that circumstances render state processes ineffective to protect his rights. Respondents filed a Response (ECF No. 44) and Petitioner filed a Reply (ECF No. 45).

Having considered the motion and related briefing, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted as Petitioner offers nothing new to establish the Court's review and conclusions were erroneous. See School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). The Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 43) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Forsythe v. Nevin

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 14, 2011
Case No.: 2:10-cv-01316-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Forsythe v. Nevin

Case Details

Full title:LARRY JAMES FORSYTHE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN NEVIN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 14, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:10-cv-01316-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2011)