Forsyth v. City of Rochester

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF THEODORE FORSYTH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2020

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4249 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

179.1 CA 19-02324

07-24-2020

IN THE MATTER OF THEODORE FORSYTH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER AND ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

ROTH & ROTH LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ELLIOT SHIELDS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY R. CURTIN, CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROCHESTER (STEPHANIE A. PRINCE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

PRESENT:

ROTH & ROTH LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ELLIOT SHIELDS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY R. CURTIN, CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROCHESTER (STEPHANIE A. PRINCE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered June 3, 2019 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order denied the motion of petitioner seeking, among other things, to hold respondents in contempt.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Forsyth v City of Rochester ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 24, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).

Entered: July 24, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court