From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forsey v. Clinton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2936 LKK DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2936 LKK DAD

01-09-2012

DEVIN FORSEY; Plaintiff, v. HILLARY CLINTON, Secretary of State, et al.; Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division ELIZABETH J. STEVENS Assistant Director, District Court Section TROY D. LIGGETT Trial Attorney (DCBN 995073) Attorneys for Defendants


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division

ELIZABETH J. STEVENS

Assistant Director, District Court Section

TROY D. LIGGETT

Trial Attorney (DCBN 995073)

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the refusal to issue a visa to his fiance. Since the filing of this lawsuit, the Department of State is in the process of returning the visa application to the Ho Chi Minh City post for further investigation. The parties therefore stipulate to a 90-day extension of time in which to file both the government's answer to the complaint and the joint status report, as the parties explore the possibility of a resolution at the administrative level.

The parties therefore stipulate that the time for filing the government's answer be extended to April 4, 2012, and that the scheduling conference, currently set for February 6, 2012, be reset to sometime after the new answer due date.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

ELIZABETH J. STEVENS

Assistant Director, District Court Section

By: __________

TROY D. LIGGETT

Trial Attorney, District Court Section

Office of Immigration Litigation

U.S. Department of Justice

____________________

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: ____________________

MARY BETH KAUFMAN

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' Answer is due on April 4, 2012, and that the scheduling conference is reset to April 30, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file their status reports 14 days prior to the status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Forsey v. Clinton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2936 LKK DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Forsey v. Clinton

Case Details

Full title:DEVIN FORSEY; Plaintiff, v. HILLARY CLINTON, Secretary of State, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2936 LKK DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)