holding that "urging and advising" witness to testify falsely violates section 1512 without indicating whether there was intimidation or misleading conduct
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BordalloNo. 84-1577.
May 28, 1985, OCTOBER TERM, 1984.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 745 F. 2d 1283.
holding that "urging and advising" witness to testify falsely violates section 1512 without indicating whether there was intimidation or misleading conduct
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bordallodiscussing enactment of § 1512
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ShivelyFull title:FORRO PRECISION, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 28, 1985
The decision whether a witness not named in the pretrial order may testify is a "matter[ ] peculiarly within…
Vermont Microsystems, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc.Under California law, the onus was on VMI to show that the display list driver incorporated in R12 Windows…