Forrester v. Nappier

Full title: John S. FORRESTER, Respondent, v. Patricia A. NAPPIER, Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

422 S.W.3d 410 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100055.

2014-03-25

John S. FORRESTER, Respondent, v. Patricia A. NAPPIER, Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Timothy W. Inman, Judge. Patricia A. Nappier, Farmington, MO, pro se. Seth Andrew Pegram, Farmington, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Timothy W. Inman, Judge.
Patricia A. Nappier, Farmington, MO, pro se.Seth Andrew Pegram, Farmington, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR. J.

ORDER

Patricia A. Nappier appeals the interlocutory order and judgment for possession and writ of possession entered by the trial court granting physical possession of property located at 826 Potosi Street in Farmington, Missouri (“the property”) to John S. Forrester. The trial court had authority to enter the interlocutory order and judgment of possession, and the judgment was not erroneous. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).