From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forrestel v. Jonkman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-24-2017

Ryan M. FORRESTEL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Marguerita M.C. JONKMAN, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.).

Marguerita M.C. Jonkman, defendant-appellant Pro Se. John P. Pieri, Buffalo, for plaintiff-respondent.


Marguerita M.C. Jonkman, defendant-appellant Pro Se.

John P. Pieri, Buffalo, for plaintiff-respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it reserved decision on plaintiff's motion is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Forrestel v. Jonkman (Appeal No. 1) –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2017 WL 1116258 (Mar. 24, 2017).

WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, and NEMOYER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Forrestel v. Jonkman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Forrestel v. Jonkman

Case Details

Full title:Ryan M. FORRESTEL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Marguerita M.C. JONKMAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
48 N.Y.S.3d 901