Forner v. American Box Board Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Fergus v. Chrysler

    67 Mich. App. 106 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 5 times
    Stating that the factfinder has wide discretion is ascribing the weight and credibility to the testimony presented

    We also have his testimony as to the nature of his work, and his further testimony that he did not think of compensation for any work-relationship to his heart disease until several years after leaving work. "`We superimpose on this matrix of evidence the Board's right to draw reasonable inferences from the proofs before us (Forner v American Box Board Co, * * * [ 319 Mich. 165; 29 N.W.2d 273 (1947)]). "`We are aware of the Court's directives not to impose any improper legal tests as to the necessity of a specific injury or certain degree of stress before a finding of work injury can be made (Sheppard v Michigan National Bank, 348 Mich. 577 [ 83 N.W.2d 614 (1957)]; and Zaremba v Chrysler Corp, 377 Mich. 226 [ 139 N.W.2d 745 (1966)]).