From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fornaro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 2001
791 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-1623

Opinion filed August 1, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.


Stephen Fornaro filed a motion purporting to seek relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 based on our supreme court's decision inHeggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). The circuit court discerned that Fornaro's motion actually sought correction of an allegedly illegal sentence and did not seek to withdraw the plea upon which the sentence was based. Therefore, the court properly treated the motion as one filed pursuant to rule 3.800 and correctly denied it.

We affirm the circuit court's order without prejudice to any right Fornaro may have to file a proper motion to withdraw his plea under rule 3.850. We note that if Fornaro files such a motion and is successful, the State, too, will be released from its side of the plea bargain. See Sidell v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D1122 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 27, 2001).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Fornaro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 2001
791 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Fornaro v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN FORNARO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 1, 2001

Citations

791 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)