From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Formel v. National City Bank of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 12, 1934
152 Misc. 275 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

July 12, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Jacob M. Goldenkoff [ Bernard Friendlander of counsel], for the appellant.

Harold H. Keefe [ Gordon Burt Affleck of counsel], for the respondent.


Rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice may not be invoked in an action for conversion. ( Gilbert v. Gotham, App. Term, First Dept., 152 Misc. 598; Rothman v. Strang, App. Term, First Dept., Id. 606.)

Judgment reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Formel v. National City Bank of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 12, 1934
152 Misc. 275 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Formel v. National City Bank of New York

Case Details

Full title:JULES C. FORMEL, Appellant, v. THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 275 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 817

Citing Cases

Wolfman v. Wilson Bldg

An accounting is sought here because of alleged acts of conversion by the defendants. It is worth noting that…

Wachtel v. Schelberg

Even an action for damages actually suffered for conversion of personal property has been held not to be…