From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. Transunion

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 3, 2024
1:23-CV-9587 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-CV-9587 (LTS)

01-03-2024

GREGORY TERRELL FOREMAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSUNION, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated November 2, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP” or “IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Foreman v. Transunion

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 3, 2024
1:23-CV-9587 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Foreman v. Transunion

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY TERRELL FOREMAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSUNION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 3, 2024

Citations

1:23-CV-9587 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)