From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 12, 2020
234 A.3d 1161 (Del. 2020)

Opinion

No. 133, 2020

06-12-2020

David FOREMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's order, dated March 4, 2020 and docketed March 6, 2020, denying the appellant's fourth motion for postconviction relief as procedurally barred. As the Superior Court observed, the appellant has not pleaded any circumstances under Rule 61(d)(2)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) that overcome the procedural bars set forth in Rule 61, nor does he claim that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction.

Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i).

Id. R. 61(i)(5).
--------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Foreman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 12, 2020
234 A.3d 1161 (Del. 2020)
Case details for

Foreman v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FOREMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jun 12, 2020

Citations

234 A.3d 1161 (Del. 2020)

Citing Cases

Foreman v. May

, 2020 WL 1069464, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 4, 2020); State v. Foreman, 234 A.3d 1161 (Table), 2020 WL…