From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2015
Case No.: 2:14-cv-785-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:14-cv-785-RDP-JEO

09-22-2015

MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. KENNETH JONES, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 3, 2015, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that Petitioner's § 2254 habeas application be denied on the ground that its claims are both time barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and unexhausted and procedurally defaulted under 28 U.S. C. § 2254(b).

A separate order in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered.

DONE and ORDERED this September 22, 2015.

/s/_________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Foreman v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2015
Case No.: 2:14-cv-785-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Foreman v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. KENNETH JONES, Warden; ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 2:14-cv-785-RDP-JEO (N.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2015)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. United States

"); Foreman v. Jones, No. 2:14-CV-0785-RDP-JEO, 2015 WL 5607725, *3 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 3, 2015)("Foreman's…