From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. Goldberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1900
30 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

February, 1900.

A.I. Spiro, for appellant.

A.H. Sarasohn, for respondent.


The evidence in this case fails to establish a contract of employment, and the judgment rendered for damages, for wrongful discharge, is absolutely without proof to support it. No period or rate of wages was specified, and the complaint should have been dismissed. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 148 N.Y. 117.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J.; GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Foreman v. Goldberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1900
30 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Foreman v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE FOREMAN, Respondent, v . JULIUS GOLDBERG, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1900

Citations

30 Misc. 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)