From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. Foreman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Seeger, J., dissent upon the ground that the rule in Woolley v. Stewart ( 222 N.Y. 347) and Burns v. McCormick (233 id. 230) is not applicable in a case where the agreement is between husband and wife.


Summaries of

Foreman v. Foreman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Foreman v. Foreman

Case Details

Full title:ISIDORE FOREMAN, Appellant, v. MYRON FOREMAN, an Infant, by JAMES J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)