From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordyce v. Cameron

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-854 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-854.

September 29, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29 day of September, 2009, after the petitioner, Albert Fordyce, Jr., filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by petitioner, and upon independent review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 12), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner (Docket No. 1) is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Fordyce v. Cameron

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-854 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Fordyce v. Cameron

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT FORDYCE, JR., Petitioner, v. KENNETH CAMERON, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-854 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2009)