From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordham v. Moore

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2013
520 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6172

04-30-2013

ANTRELL JERMAINE FORDHAM, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a Antrell J. Fordham, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Antrell Jermaine Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Shelton Webber Haile, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00974-MGL) Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antrell Jermaine Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Shelton Webber Haile, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antrell Jermaine Fordham appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fordham v. Moore, No. 2:12-cv-00974-MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Fordham v. Moore

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2013
520 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Fordham v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:ANTRELL JERMAINE FORDHAM, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a Antrell J. Fordham…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2013)