From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordham v. Manzola

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 5, 2019
No. 19-6425 (4th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6425

09-05-2019

CHRIS FORDHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MANZOLA; CORRECTIONS OFFICER STEED; SERGEANT LEE LEWIS; W. FOX; MR. WILLIAMS; RN LEWIS; LPN AKUCHE; CORRECTIONS OFFICER THOMAS, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN BRANKER, Defendant.

Christopher James Fordham, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03099-BO) Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher James Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher James Fordham appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fordham v. Manzola, No. 5:16-ct-03099-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Fordham v. Manzola

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 5, 2019
No. 19-6425 (4th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Fordham v. Manzola

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS FORDHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MANZOLA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 5, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6425 (4th Cir. Sep. 5, 2019)