From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordham v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 6, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV 00907-JE (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)

Summary

holding ALJ did not err in omitting moderate limitations in social functioning under paragraph B at step three from RFC

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

Case No. 6:13 CV 00907-JE

01-06-2015

KELLY L. FORDHAM, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Jelderks filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 26, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Jelderk's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 6th January, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fordham v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 6, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV 00907-JE (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)

holding ALJ did not err in omitting moderate limitations in social functioning under paragraph B at step three from RFC

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.
Case details for

Fordham v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:KELLY L. FORDHAM, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:13 CV 00907-JE (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

The ALJ must consider the step two and three limitations, along with all of the other relevant evidence in…