From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordham v. Artrip

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia
Oct 2, 2024
Civil Action 7:24-cv-00566 (W.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:24-cv-00566

10-02-2024

BRANDON LAMAR FORDHAM, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY ARTRIP, et al., Defendant(s).


MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983. By order entered August 27, 2024, the court directed plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of the order, the consent to withholding of filing fees form in order to complete the application to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 30 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court will dismiss the action without prejudice and strike the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Fordham v. Artrip

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia
Oct 2, 2024
Civil Action 7:24-cv-00566 (W.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Fordham v. Artrip

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON LAMAR FORDHAM, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY ARTRIP, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 7:24-cv-00566 (W.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2024)