From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fordham Hill Associates v. Robert Fiebach

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 5, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 277 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

November 5, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of the Bronx, VINCENT N. TRIMARCO, J.

Hiram G. Shields and Harold W. Grubart for appellant.

No one appearing for respondents.


The tenants by remaining in possession of decontrolled premises after the expiration of their lease are in law deemed to hold over at the increased rental fixed by the landlord in the notice sent before the lease expired ( 4145 Corp. v. Brown, 19 Misc.2d 957; Avelino v. Fasano, 15 Misc.2d 635).

The final order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order directed for landlord, fixing the monthly rental at $160 and awarding judgment for $320, with interest and costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Fordham Hill Associates v. Robert Fiebach

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 5, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 277 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Fordham Hill Associates v. Robert Fiebach

Case Details

Full title:FORDHAM HILL ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. ROBERT FIEBACH et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1959

Citations

21 Misc. 2d 277 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

Ungar v. Schwartz

Where the landlord by reasonable notice notifies a month-to-month tenant of an increase in rent, the tenant…

South Carolina Leasing Co. v. Allen

By remaining in possession after the expiration of his lease, tenant is deemed to have assented to the…