From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Oct 14, 1921
54 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3958.

October 14, 1921.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are the same as in W. P. Fuller Co. v. Chatham et al., 53 Cal.App. 800 [ 200 P. 293].

A. A. Moore, Stanley Moore and L. R. Weinmann for Appellants.

Hartley F. Peart and Olin L. Berry for Respondent.


This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor's bond from a judgment in favor of a materialman. The case is parallel in all of its facts with the case entitled W. P. Fuller Co. v. Chatham et al., 53. Cal.App. 800 [ 200 P. 293]. A petition to have that case heard and determined by the supreme court was by that court denied September 15, 1921.

Since this case was filed, the Fuller case was heard and determined on appeal. Counsel for appellants have courteously called to our attention the above facts.

On the authority of the Fuller case the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.


Summaries of

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Oct 14, 1921
54 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
Case details for

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham

Case Details

Full title:FORDERER CORNICE WORKS (a Corporation), Respondent, v. WILLIAM CHATHAM et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Oct 14, 1921

Citations

54 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
202 P. 1117

Citing Cases

In re McCue

The facts shown, standing as they do without extenuation or excuse, justify a judgment of expulsion of T.F.…