From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Yasuda

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
EDCV 13-01961-PSG (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS: None present.

          ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS: None present.


         

          HON. DAVID T. BRISTOW, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

         PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

         The parties' proposed Stipulation and Protective Order has been referred by the District Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. The parties are advised that the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated for the following reasons:

1. Proposed ¶ 6.3 needs to be revised to make clear that any motion challenging a designation brought pursuant to that paragraph will need to be made in strict compliance with Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 (including the Joint Stipulation requirement).


Summaries of

Ford v. Yasuda

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
EDCV 13-01961-PSG (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Ford v. Yasuda

Case Details

Full title:Maria Ford, et al v. Gary Yasuda, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

EDCV 13-01961-PSG (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)