From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Village of Croton-On-Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 31, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On the record before us, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action due to the failure of the plaintiff's counsel to be ready for trial on the scheduled adjourned date (see, 22 NYCRR 125.1 [g]). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. Village of Croton-On-Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Ford v. Village of Croton-On-Hudson

Case Details

Full title:DONALD FORD, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF CROTON-ON-HUDSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Malachi v. Good Samaritan Hospital

The first violation occurred on January 29, 1996, when the plaintiff's attorney did not appear or produce…

Foster v. Gherardi

That attorney orally informed the court that the plaintiffs' attorney of record was engaged in another trial.…