From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 27, 1968
447 P.2d 454 (Okla. Crim. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. A-14969.

November 27, 1968.

An appeal from the District Court of Bryan County; Alan B. McPheron, Judge.

Pat Phelps, Durant, for plaintiff in error.

G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of Uttering a Forged Instrument After Former Conviction in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, and sentenced to Thirteen Years in the penitentiary.

He has perfected his appeal to this Court raising several allegations of error. A review of the testimony and of the record fails to sustain these allegations.

Where a careful reading of the record and a study of the briefs reveal no error that would justify reversal or modification. this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court may see fit, as is prescribed by statute. 20 O.S. § 49[ 20-49], 1968.

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 27, 1968
447 P.2d 454 (Okla. Crim. App. 1968)
Case details for

Ford v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLY BOB FORD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DEFENDANT IN…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 27, 1968

Citations

447 P.2d 454 (Okla. Crim. App. 1968)
1968 OK CR 212

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. State

Where a careful reading of the record, and a study of the briefs, reveal no error that would justify…

Gilmore v. State

Where a careful reading of the record, and a study of the briefs, reveal no error that would justify…