From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 3, 2000
756 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-1507.

Opinion filed May 3, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dwight Geiger, Judge; L.T. No. 98-146 CFA.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant moved to withdraw his no contest plea on numerous grounds, including that he was coerced by his appointed counsel. Upon review of the transcript, we find that although Appellant used the term "coercion" once throughout the extensive questioning of the trial judge, his claim that counsel failed to visit him in jail and further investigate his case did not amount to coercion. Therefore, we find no error in the trial court's refusal to grant his motion to withdraw plea, nor in the trial court's failure to appoint new counsel to Appellant.

DELL, STONE, and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 3, 2000
756 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ford v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUAN FORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)