From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-325-BAJ-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-325-BAJ-DLD

09-20-2012

BRENDIA FORD v. CARL ROGERS


RULING AND ORDER

The Court has carefully considered the motion, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Docia L. Dalby dated July 19, 2012 (doc. 7), and plaintiffs' objection filed August 3, 2012 (doc. 8).

The Court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to consolidate complaints (doc. 5) is denied, and the new "complaint" shall be filed into the docket as a separate action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Ford's complaint and amended complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous, and Ford's application to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is dismissed as moot.

The Court observes that Ms. Ford has additionally filed a motion for judge review (doc. 9). In this motion, Ms. Ford asserts the same frivolous and nonsensical arguments that she made in her objection.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for judge review (doc. 9) is denied.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 20, 2012.

________________________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Ford v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-325-BAJ-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Ford v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:BRENDIA FORD v. CARL ROGERS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-325-BAJ-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)