From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Pivot MFG

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 1, 1996
219 Mich. App. 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Docket No. 180928.

Submitted October 11, 1995, at Detroit. Decided February 2, 1996, at 9:05 A.M. Submitted on rehearing October 1, 1996.

Decided on rehearing November 1, 1996, at 9:00 A.M.

Rifkin Kingsley, P.C. (by Michael J. Kingsley), for the plaintiff.

Blake, Kirchner, Symonds, MacFarlane, Larson Smith, P.C. (by F. Peter Blake and Christopher G. Manolis), for the defendant.

Before: MICHAEL J. KELLY, P.J., and O'CONNELL and J.R. Giddings, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


ON REHEARING


On February 2, 1996, we released for publication an opinion reversing the trial court's grant of summary disposition for defendant under MCR 2.116(C)(10). Ford v Pivot Mfg Co, 215 Mich. App. 310; 544 N.W.2d 770 (1996). Defendant timely filed a motion for rehearing that was pending when the Supreme Court released the consolidated cases in Travis v Dreis Krump Mfg Co, 453 Mich. 149; 551 N.W.2d 132 (1996). Those decisions of the Supreme Court interpreted the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131(1); MSA 17.237(131)(1), consistent with the dissenting opinion of Judge O'CONNELL in our decision of February 2, 1996.

On May 15, 1996, we took the motion for rehearing under advisement. On August 29, 1996, we granted rehearing, and this opinion is the result. The decision of February 2, 1996, is set aside and the decision of the Wayne Circuit Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge O'CONNELL at 215 Mich. App. 315.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ford v. Pivot MFG

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 1, 1996
219 Mich. App. 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Ford v. Pivot MFG

Case Details

Full title:FORD v PIVOT MANUFACTURING COMPANY (ON REHEARING)

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 1, 1996

Citations

219 Mich. App. 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996)
558 N.W.2d 1