From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.).


While plaintiff's notice and amended notice of claim did not reveal that he fell when he stepped on a board that was covering the third step in the first floor stairwell and that the stairwell was poorly lit at the time, such information was supplied at the statutory hearing held five months after the accident. In addition, the police who were called to the scene reported that plaintiff fell over steps being repaired while employed by third-party defendant Wilkins Sons Corp. A notice of claim will be deemed sufficient where, as here, the defendant is given accurate information as to the date, time and place of the incident, and an unintentional absence of specificity as to the exact manner in which the incident occurred is cured in timely fashion (see, Horowitz v. New York City Hous. Auth., 188 A.D.2d 392). We also note that this motion was made eight years after the hearing was held.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Ford v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Ford v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FORD, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 413