From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. New Britain Trans

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 6, 2007
239 F. App'x 670 (2d Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-5055-cv.

September 6, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Kravitz, J.).

Charles J. Ford, New Britain, CT, pro se.

Drew S. Graham, Assistant Attorney General Hartford, CT, John A. Blazi, Law Offices of John A. Blazi Waterbury, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Hon. B.D. PARKER and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.


ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.


SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Charles J. Ford, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Kravitz, J.) dismissing his fifth amended complaint. The parties' familiarity with the facts is assumed. For the reasons stated in the District Court's order entered July 25, 2005, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ford v. New Britain Trans

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 6, 2007
239 F. App'x 670 (2d Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Ford v. New Britain Trans

Case Details

Full title:Charles J. FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW BRITAIN TRANS. CO., City of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2007

Citations

239 F. App'x 670 (2d Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Sodexo, Inc.

Id. at *5 (citing Ford v. New Britain Trans. Co., No. 3:03 CV 150, 2005 WL 1785269, at *1 (D. Conn. July 26,…

Caro v. Fid. Brokerage Servs.

Phillips v. Girdich, 408 F.3d 124, 130 (2d Cir.2005). Nonetheless, the Court need not engage in "rank…