From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Mercy Clinic

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Jan 17, 2024
No. 23-CV-88-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-88-JFH-JAR

01-17-2024

KENEGEE E. FORD, Plaintiff, v. MERCY CLINIC et al., Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN F. HEIL, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson. Dkt. No. 11. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the case dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with the Court's order to show cause [Dkt. No. 9]. Dkt. No. 11.

Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within the fourteen-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and accepts and adopts it as the order of this Court. On that basis, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ford v. Mercy Clinic

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Jan 17, 2024
No. 23-CV-88-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Ford v. Mercy Clinic

Case Details

Full title:KENEGEE E. FORD, Plaintiff, v. MERCY CLINIC et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

No. 23-CV-88-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)