From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Keffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-718-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-718-Y

01-12-2012

BRENDA LEE FORD, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Brenda Lee Ford under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;
2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on January 5,2011; and
3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on January 10, 2011.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner's objections must be overruled, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Brenda Lee Ford's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

___________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ford v. Keffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-718-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Ford v. Keffer

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA LEE FORD, Petitioner, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-718-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Lee v. United States

Accordingly, defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance on this ground. E.g., United States v.…